Basic Assignments
|
Options & Settings
|
Main Time Information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Sorry, no photos available for this element of time.
|
|
Notes:
|
Steve and I were going over sub inventory attributes. We got into all kinds of attributes. We talked about sub inventory attributes, parent attributes, and flex attributes. Currently, each section or attribute does a specific thing. There is a growing need for more or better sub attributes and parent attributes. Easier to get things into the database for storage and easier to pull the data back out. I mentioned to Steve that we would really like to add a few fields and values to the current sub inventory attributes. They are things like: part category id, app type id, main id (tied to the part_id), and sub inventory attribute id numbers. We have some of those columns but there has not been a project to standardize things yet. It's still on the wish list. Quite a bit of talk about new corp-specific tables and data storage. Evolution... everything is evolutionary... look and feel, logic, business flow, and even sales (how we sell our products and services). We will keep working on making it easier and easier to use. SG&A costs (selling general and administrative costs) and going clear out to the financials. To the client, it is just data storage. To us, we have to make it all flow and work together as a system. Sometimes that's a challenge. As recap - for sub inventory attributes or sub attributes: 1. Add the part category id as a look-up value (this would be a new column) If we could add these fields and/or data points into the sub inventory attributes, it would be so much better for getting the data back out of the system. Currently, things are tied to the sub inventory id or sub reference id. We then look that up to figure out the part id and then use the part id to look-up the part category id. It would duplicate a little bit of data but it would make it so much easier to find things and quickly reference things. Currently, we have to join multiple tables and go virtually up and down the chain to find everything that we need. I would recommend that we do a special project, add the above, do some clean-up and then move forward. That would really help. Just my two cents. |